Burning coal
Bruno Prior
Our World in Data (and many others) tell us that wind and solar have fallen dramatically to well below the cost of coal- and gas-fired electricity. But their data look suspect for anyone who remembers the wholesale price of electricity in the mid-2000s. The claims for wind and solar have received a lot of well-justified scrutiny. They are nonsense. In this article, we look at another element - the cost of coal-fired electricity. It has apparently remained almost constant at around $110/MWh from 2009 to 2019. In reality, it was a fraction of that in 2009. The cost of coal has varied dramatically over the period, which will have produced much more variation in the cost of coal-fired generation than indicated by OWiD's misleading charts. When you look at how the costs and shares of various electricity technologies have varied over the period, it is impossible to square the claimed costs with the volumes and prices (wholesale and retail).
Snowy solar panels
Bruno Prior
Clean energy advocates think we can use the batteries in an electrified road transport system to balance the supply of intermittent renewable electricity with the demand for electricity, including electrified heat and transport. They are wrong. It can work to a small extent, but it barely touches the sides of the problem.
Energy storage technologies, scaling projections
Bruno Prior
Green armchair experts see interseasonal energy storage as the technology that will bring their plans together, and think it is just a matter of investment and technological progress. Most sceptics also think it's about technology, but believe there are insuperable technical barriers. In reality, the main barrier is economic not technical. We explore this fundamental economic challenge with reference to a recent announcement regarding one of the more promising technologies.
Wilted red rose (cropped)
Bruno Prior
Labour's energy and climate-change proposals in their 2019 manifesto are vastly more expensive than they recognise - probably £1bn by 2030 and £1.5-2bn ASAP in the 2030s. This spending would reduce carbon emissions by less than 50% by 2030. One unintended consequence is that, despite so much infrastructure spending, electricity supply would occasionally be insufficient to meet the radically increased demand.
Pile of coal
Nicola Frost
The decline of coal-fired electricity highlights important challenges for a network relying more heavily on intermittent generation.

We use cookies on our website to support technical features that enhance your user experience.

We also use analytics & advertising services. To opt-out click for more information.